An Open Letter: To All Who Are Angry
A few weeks ago I heard Arun
Gandhi, co-founder of the M.K.
Gandhi Institute for Noviolence (http://www.gandhiinstitute.org),
speak about the importance of recognizing thefact that anger
is the ultimate source of violence. In his talk, Dr. Gandhi
reminded us of how important it is for us to search for the
sources of anger, whether it is anger directed at us or anger
coming from within. For me, this advice hasn't come a moment
As the true magnitude of last
Tuesday's events began to sink in, I was disturbed to find
myself filling with rage . . . fueled by my anger. So as I
began to examine my anger and search for its source, I was
unsettled by what I found. Here are a few of the reasons I
am angry today:
- I am angry at myself for not raising my voice in protest
several years ago when Madeleine Albright, then the U.S.
Secretary of State, was asked if an embargo was worth the
price of the more than 500,000 Iraqi children who died,
and she said, ". . . this
is a very hard choice, but we think the price was worth
- I am angry at myself for not writing more letters to newspaper
editors and television commentators asking them why they
are so one-sided in their coverage of the war between Israel
- I am angry at myself for not asking my elected representatives
why they went along with giving the Taliban $43 million
just two months after they destroyed those priceless, 2,000
year old statues of Buddha.
- I am angry at myself for not speaking out more loudly
about the fact that not only is the United States the world's
largest supplier of weapons to the world, but that the U.S.
also provides much of the training in their use.
The list goes on, but I will
spare you the rest of the details. I am sure that you have
lists of your own. My purpose in only listing the anger directed
at myself is to point out the simple fact that in a world
as deeply interconnected as ours, we all must accept some
responsibility for the shape it is in.
If I had spoken up more,
written more letters, read more reports in the foreign press,
and done all of those other little things I now wished I had
done, would the situation be any different today? Most likely
not, but at least I would not be so angry at myself for not
However, if all of us who feel
this way, all of us who seek justice and not revenge, all
of us who seek peace and not war now speak up, then hope for
a better world remains alive. Personally, I don't have any
answers that aren't already on the minds of millions of others.
So my response is to post some of these thoughts on our website.
If you know of other sane voices who are able to see the larger
picture and have ideas that go beyond the reflexive reactions
of those who only want more bloodshed, please send them to
us, and we will post them as time permits.
There is one last thought I
would like to leave you with, and that is what 'collateral
damage' means in human terms. One of my closest friends
lost his mother, his brothers and sisters, his grandparents,
aunts, uncles, and cousins (not to mention most of his friends)
when he was eight years old. Over 60 people, human beings
with families, friends and full lives, were wiped out in an
instant when a bomb, from an American B-52, was accidentally
dropped in the wrong place. I didn't see the actual report
of this incident, but I know from first-hand experience how
they are written. It most likely said, ". . . 60+ civilians,
killed in action, collateral damage of friendly fire."
When I heard that over 60% of Americans now favor military
action in spite of the fact that many innocent civilian lives
may be lost, I began to weep. I wept not only for those innocent
people who may soon lose their lives, but I also wept for
our country. My only hope is that we will come to our senses
before the violence reaches even more massive proportions.
As a good friend of mine said today, "Killing innocent
people is terrorism, no matter who does it."
Peace, love, and light to you all,
CLICK here to download the PDF version of this essay)